(Yonkers Historical Society) Yonkers, N.Y., diverted the Saw Mill River through a giant underground flume in the 1920s. Now, inspired by other cities’ efforts to “daylight” such waterways, Yonkers is trying to unbury the river and create a greenway along its banks.

(Yonkers Historical Society) Yonkers, N.Y., diverted the Saw Mill River through a giant underground flume in the 1920s. Now, inspired by other cities’ efforts to “daylight” such waterways, Yonkers is trying to unbury the river and create a greenway along its banks.

The New York Times has a story about the popularity of restoring forgotten urban streams.  These streams are forgotten because they have been piped and paved over, making them seem to be just another part of the storm drainage system.  This was often done to hide the pollution that ran through urban streams prior to the various waste treatment measures that have become widespread.  Restoration of these streams has become a worldwide phenomenon involving reaches in such varied locations as Seoul, New York, London, Los Angeles, San Antonio, and Vancouver.  One might even count Rocky Branch, which runs through North Carolina State University and highlights the work of the Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department.

There are various reasons for this movement.  The first is to bring a bit of nature to the city much as one might do with a park.  It makes the city a friendlier place that attracts more visitors and provides a place for recreation.  However, the reasons for restoration go deeper than that.  For example, streams provide habitat.  The streams in Vancouver used to provide spawning grounds for salmon.  By providing habitat, we improve and augment the food chain, which will ultimately improve and augment our own food.  Another example is the cleaning and filtering of runoff that is performed by floodplains.  Many of the elements found in stormwater runoff are either themselves health hazards or are nutrients in such over-supply that can cause microbes to run wild; in turn causing their own problems.  By removing these elements, the floodplain protects the stream habitat and downstream water supplies.  Ultimately, we are all connected to and use these streams: to bathe in, drink from, and grow food (in the wild or via agriculture).  It is heartening that so many places have seen the importance of using them wisely.

Tags: , , ,



The New York TimesAccording to the New York Times, the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) is drafting new federal floodplain rules to be mandated by Executive Order.  These rules are to be followed by the federal government and likely by anyone using federal money for a project.  It seems that the federal government, like state departments of transportation, has been having trouble following the rules put forth by the FEMA National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and the White House would like have it lead by example.  For this reason, these proposed rules are likely to exceed the minimums mandated by the NFIP.  For example, critical infrastructure is not to be located in the 500-year floodplain unless no alternative is available.  If development does occur in the 100-year floodplain, it is to occur in consultation with state and local officials; thus making it follow their rules should they prove more strict.

Tags: , , , ,



The New York Times

The New York Times has posted an opinion piece advocating for some important legislation regarding our nation’s infrastructure that has been lost in light of carbon trading, Supreme Court nominations, etc.  This legislation would establish a national infrastructure development bank.  The bank would use its own permanent fund to issue long-term, low-rate loans and bonds for the purposes of building road, public transit, drainage, water supply, flood-control, environmental mitigation, waste treatment and disposal, power, communications, and other projects.  In short, it would make it easier to create and maintain all those things, seen and unseen, that keep our world going.  This would be a great thing as the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) rates almost all of these categories as a C- or lower in its annual report card due to a lack of investment.  The ASCE doesn’t mention internet access, however, which is also much faster, cheaper, and more generally available in other developed countries.  We have some catching up to do and this seems a good way to get there.

Tags: , , ,